Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I _ ase 3:02-cv-O21?.7-I\/IRK Document 20 Filed O2/O2/2004 Page 1 of 3
(I, I) .
I I
I . WI
f VA _ ; _!
F riigj? ` I I
ia: .`·Q` fan I
fl in MII [Isla`; I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO"UR'IT_I I- . _, ‘ ,
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I I
I I
RHARD v. ROBINSON
; CIVIL ACTION NO. I
Plaintiff ; 3:02 Cv 2197 (MRR) I
V. Z I
CITY OF HARTFORD, ET AL FEBRUARY 1, 2004 I
Defendants :
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I
I
Pursuant to Rule 56 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the defendants,
CITY OF HARTFORD and ALBERT G. ILG, hereby move for Summary Judglment I
on Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, in its entirety, on the basis that there are no I
material facts in dispute ansd they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. I
In support of this Motion, the defendants rely upon the accompanying I
I
Memorandum of law, Local Rule 56(a)(l) Statement and attached Appendices. I
I
I
I
I

p w_F—FI
I -. “ ase 3:02-cv-O21€7¥l\/IRK Document 20 Filed O2/P27?OO4 Page 2 of 3
I I
I I I
` I
I I
I WHEREFORE, the defendants request that judgment enter in their favor as a
I matter of law. I
DEFENDANTS
<; ‘te·· . , F I
BY Qtssi ,.5 I
Helen Apostolidis I
_ Assistant Corporation Counsel I
Their Attorney
550 Main Street I
Hartford, CT 06103 I
Federal Bar No. Ct 05534 p
Telephone (860) 543-8575 5
Facsimile (860) 722-8114 {

` I
I
HTlSWCl' 2 I
I
s..--»..-.-.....*..... . ...2 ....._.... __ _ ______I
I
I
I
I

l . “ ase 3:02-cv-O21€7%}/IRK Document 20 Filed O2/02fi\2004 Page 3 of 3
l --~»· \,__/
l u
l l
l
CERTIFICATION l
l This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, postage prepaid, this l
~ 2nd. day of February 2004 to:
l M. Hatcher Norris, Esq. I
l Butler, Norris & Gold =
K 254 Prospect Avenue é
. Hartford, CT 06106 l
l
( I In 1.
<·s—~·i—\,~$·L»..s;.-_m»...i
Helen Apostolidis g
l
‘ answer 3 I
l
I
I
- .-.»A`wF¤ ¤.._....; .; ww l
l