Free Unpublished Opinion/Order - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 41.4 kB
Pages: 5
Date: May 12, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 970 Words, 6,175 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/639/60.pdf

Download Unpublished Opinion/Order - District Court of Federal Claims ( 41.4 kB)


Preview Unpublished Opinion/Order - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:00-cv-00775-TCW

Document 60

Filed 05/12/2006

Page 1 of 5

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 00-775C (Filed: May 12, 2006) ***************************************** * * BRERO CONSTRUCTION, INC. * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * ***************************************** * ORDER DIRECTING JUDGMENT On May 12, 2006 the parties filed with the Court a Stipulation For Entry Of Judgment establishing the terms of a settlement agreement resolving the claims of the Plaintiff and the counterclaim of the Defendant. Accordingly, the Court hereby directs the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in this case consistent with the attached stipulation, and to dismiss with prejudice all claims and counterclaims asserted by either party in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Thomas C. Wheeler THOMAS C. WHEELER Judge

Case 1:00-cv-00775-TCW Case 1:00-cv-00775-TCW

Document 60 Document 59

Filed 05/12/2006 Filed 05/12/2006

Page 1 of 4 Page 2 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BRERO CONSTRUCTION, INC. Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 00-775C (Judge Wheeler)

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT To settle the claims asserted in the complaint and to permit the entry of final judgment on those claims, without constituting an admission of liability on the part of defendant, it is stipulated and agreed between the parties: 1. On January 15, 1993, plaintiff, Brero Construction, Inc. ("Brero"), entered into

Contract No. E-4098-3-00-82-20 (the "Contract") with the United States Department of Labor ("DOL") to construct a Job Corps Training Center in San Jose, California. 2. On May 15, 2000, pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act ("CDA"), Brero

submitted two re-certified claims to the contracting officer in the amounts of $246,411.97 and $697,826.80, for delay costs and costs related to loss of efficiency, respectively. These claims totaled $944,238.77. On June 1, 2000, the contracting officer denied Brero's May 15, 2000 claims and asserted a $9,870 counterclaim for liquidated damages due to Brero's delay in completing the contract. 3. On December 21, 2000, Brero filed this lawsuit, seeking payment of its May 15,

2000 claim. On March 23, 2001, the United States answered Brero's complaint and filed a counterclaim, seeking payment of the contracting officer's liquidated damages claim.

Case 1:00-cv-00775-TCW Case 1:00-cv-00775-TCW

Document 60 Document 59

Filed 05/12/2006 Filed 05/12/2006

Page 2 of 4 Page 3 of 5

4.

The parties subsequently entered into negotiations designed to resolve amicably

Brero's claims. Brero has offered to settle this case in exchange for payment by the United States in the amount of $90,000.00, inclusive of interest, with each party to bear its own costs, attorney fees, and expenses and with the United States dismissing its counterclaim. 5. 6. Brero's offer has been accepted on behalf of the Attorney General. The United States consents to entry of judgment against the United States in favor

of Brero as set forth in paragraph 4. 7. Upon entry of judgment, Brero releases, waives, and abandons all claims against

the United States, its political subdivisions, its officers, agents, and employees, arising out of or related to the contract or otherwise involved in this case, regardless of whether they were included in the complaint, including, but not limited to, all claims for costs, expenses, attorney fees, compensatory damages, and exemplary damages. 8. This stipulation is in no way related to or concerned with income or other taxes

for which Brero is now liable or may become liable in the future as a result of this stipulation or as a result of entry of a final judgment. 9. Brero warrants and represents that no other action or suit with respect to the

claims advanced in this suit is pending or will be filed in or submitted to any other court, administrative agency, or legislative body. Brero further warrants and represents that it has made no assignment or transfer of all or any part of its rights arising out of or relating to the claims advanced in this suit. Should there be now or in the future any violation of these warranties and representations, any amount paid by the United States pursuant to this stipulation or pursuant to any judgment entered pursuant to this stipulation shall be refunded promptly by Brero, together with interest thereon at the rates provided in 41 U.S.C. ยง 611, computed from the 2

Case 1:00-cv-00775-TCW Case 1:00-cv-00775-TCW

Document 60 Document 59

Filed 05/12/2006 Filed 05/12/2006

Page 3 of 4 Page 4 of 5

date the United States makes such payment. 10. This stipulation is for the purposes of settling this case and permitting entry of

final judgment, and for no other. Accordingly, this stipulation shall not bind the parties, nor shall it be cited or otherwise referred to, in any proceedings, whether judicial or administrative in nature, in which the parties or counsel for the parties have or may acquire an interest, except as is necessary to effect the terms of this stipulation. 11. Plaintiff's counsel represents that he has been and is authorized to enter into this

stipulation on behalf of Brero. 12. This document constitutes a complete integration of the stipulation between the

parties and supercedes any and all prior oral or written representations, understandings or agreements among or between them.

AGREED TO: PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director s/ Todd Hughes TODD M. HUGHES Assistant Director Authorized Representative of the Attorney General

3

Case 1:00-cv-00775-TCW Case 1:00-cv-00775-TCW

Document 60 Document 59

Filed 05/12/2006 Filed 05/12/2006

Page 4 of 4 Page 5 of 5

s/ Ronald L. Roberts RONALD L. ROBERTS Post Office Box 3235 Monument, CO 80132 Tele: (719) 593-7773

s/ J. Reid Prouty J. REID PROUTY Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor, 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 305-7586 Fax: (202) 514-7969 Attorneys for Defendant

Attorney for Brero Construction, Inc. Dated: May 12, 2006

4