Free Order on Motion to Strike - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 8.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 281 Words, 1,884 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/14724/107.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Strike - District Court of Colorado ( 8.9 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Strike - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:02-cv-01990-RPM-MJW

Document 107

Filed 01/03/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 02-cv-01990-RPM

NATIONAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff(s), v. J. R. MISKEN INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., SIGNATURE UNDERWRITERS, INC., and JAMES R. MISKEN, Defendant(s). _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR REVIEW OF TAXATION OF COSTS _____________________________________________________________________ On December 8, 2004, the defendants filed a motion for review of taxation of costs, seeking recovery of $14,742.51 in costs over and above those allowed by the Clerk of this Court, asserting entitlement to that award under C.R.S. 13-17-202. The plaintiff filed a response in opposition on December 17, 2004, and this Court reserved ruling pending pending an appeal of the judgment. That appeal has now been determined and on December 30, 2005, the defendants moved for a ruling on the motion. The defendants rely on the Tenth Circuit opinion in Garcia v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 209 F.3d 1170 (10th Cir. 2000) to support their contention that the Colorado statute is applicable. The motion, however, is based on Fed.R.Civ.P. 68 because of the defendants' rejected offer of judgment. The Garcia analysis is not applicable here because Rule 68 provides the rule of decision and state law is not applicable. The additional costs sought are not recoverable under 28 U.S.C. § § 1920 and 1821.

1

Case 1:02-cv-01990-RPM-MJW

Document 107

Filed 01/03/2006

Page 2 of 2

According, it is ORDERED that the defendants' motion for review of taxation of costs is denied. DATED: January 3rd, 2006 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

2