Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 19.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 30, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 353 Words, 2,143 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192420/65-1.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 19.7 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02747-SI

Document 65

Filed 06/30/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In order to better evaluate defendant's motion for summary judgment, the Court directs the parties to answer the following questions. In their responses, the parties may submit supplemental declarations and may indicate the specific location within the factual record of any supporting documents. The parties shall file their responses no later than July 10, 2008. 1) Do the 2003 bid sign-up sheets, Tam Decl. Ex. A Int. Ex. 23, represent the vacancy status of Tractor/Trailer Operator ("TTO") positions as of May 2002? 2) Is there any evidence corroborating Mr. Tam's statement that a vacant driver position existed in May 2002 following Mr. Reinosa's death in 2002? 3) Is there any evidence indicating that all of the TTO positions vacant in May 2002 were awarded to part-time drivers? 4) Do the 2005 bid assignment sheets, Tam Decl. Ex. A Int. Ex. 24, represent the vacancy status of TTO positions as of May 2005? 5) Were there any vacant TTO positions in May 2005? 6) Is there any evidence indicating that the all of TTO positions vacant in May 2005 were awarded to part-time drivers? v. JOHN E. POTTER, Defendant. / JEFFREY W. TAM, Plaintiff, No. C 07-2747 SI ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:07-cv-02747-SI

Document 65

Filed 06/30/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

7) Does Tam's electronic reassignment request, Wang Decl. Ex. A Int. Ex. 6 at 2, request reassignment to a full-time TTO position? 8) Is there any reason why defendant should value plaintiff's written request for reassignment to a part-time position, Wang Decl. Ex. A Int. Ex. 5, over his electronic request for reassignment to a full-time position?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 30, 2008 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

2