Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 5:07-cr-00282-RMW

Document 43

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 1 of 3

! RI(JHARP) (: !'HENG (CASRN 1 ?5?9:!)
I

Assistant I; Jnitel t

Statcs Attorncv

i 50 Almadt n BouIevarci San Jose, C tlifornia 951 13 Telephone. ~408) 535-7 136
Facsimile. +OSj 53 5->C'66 k n l i l : liCh;Id,ChCIlg~i?JdUj.gj i
*E-FILED - 2/14/08*

10'

!3?T:'iD I.jT!*TES

ETSTRTCT CC)l.J!?T

11
12

NORTFI!?R?JDDTFTNC'T OF CALFORYIP\
S.CLN JOSE DIVISlC.)i\i

13
1%

WITBD STA

:is OF ~ L ~ I E Z C ~ ~ . )

No.

CR (l7-00282-P~'Il'it'
xxxxxxxxxxxxx

1~

1

1 1
nefcn? wt.

j

FRO^? TEE S P E E ~ Y TRTAi. ACT CAT Cy.7.AT!ON (13 1J C.C. 3151 (5\(8)(A))

19 11

- ------1 .On Jan lary 28, 2096, the p ~nie.5 appeaxed for a heanng before thls Coun. At that

)

zo
2i

iI
1

I
/

hasi~lg, cieicn ,e C O I I T I regiesteif at;, ~~~ i:xclusifin of time ulrJar thiz Syctdy Tlial Act based upoil

a;!

ii, Jcie;ise

couns..i's

to

. cffeci;~,;, 2::cjja:e by .revtew:ny ihc lxgc mkvut~t maienais; ly
,

.

.

I

hy ? :c ~ ~ v e ; n m c z4. !la: ~,imc, Coun rcr tile :::jifci for s hear-ing v r F c b u m 4, i1 ihc

-

i1
I

.:OOf!,the parti.cs again appeared for a hearing before this Court. 1
26
27

i
i

1

( At that hearin!!: defense counsei : ~ ? a irequested an exclusion of time under the Speedy T r ~ a Act n l
dcfensc belie\ cs i s still ~ i l t j t ~ d ~ l airid10 tornplete disiussions regading loss mouiits for t!\c :,l;,

I

nrt~t.1 ( based upon dt t n s r cou~~srl's ti: c:ummunicate to the Govenurlent, items of discovery the

I

28

1
I

I

i

SzE06EtLLS UEl1:lL 8002 5

o 1 1 a ~ s o 3 v u o s r n o ~ ' y ~ r ~ ~ a w L E : Z O80 SO ~ pan a3aa
------------------

Case 5:07-cr-00282-RMW

Document 43

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 2 of 3

4

5

6
7

II

1 effectwe prqa-atir?o, taking into 3:-count !he c u e r c w of due d ~ l l ~ e n Finally, the partles agree ~e.
! lhat the ends O-'justiceserved by :;,ranting the requested conttnuance outweigh the best lntercsr o i id

1 rcq~!crrcc!ron?nv.vce -?,o:~!ditn.r::.o,sbly i

deny dckgst cn!!grel reacon~hlc !!me nrcessary Br

/
I

II
1

1 [he public. and the delenda!ll in a speedy 1114 in ti,a prompt disposition of onminzi c n i i i . and

E 'd
-

SZE06EtLTS
-

o 1 1 a ~ s o 3 % u o s ? n o l r ~ ~ ~ J J a L E : Z O 80 S O q a j ~~
pan I a3ad
-

we11: 11 800Z S q a j

Case 5:07-cr-00282-RMW

Document 43
xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Filed 02/14/2008

Page 3 of 3

3

I

1 ORDERS that !he t i ~ bct*.~crn e !~:ui~ry3E 2OCS znd Mxoh -31: 201)s i ~ s c l u d c d under thc
Tr!?! F c, ? T( !!,S.C, $3161 The c01!rt finds tha? !he fail~rreto g ~ ? ! the req!!ec!cc!
l unreasonahlv !:'en11defense co~.tnc! ? reasonable ti.mr: ncresrary for effecrive

II
I
I I 1 I I

5

6

il 11 preparation, ta cing into account t1.11;exclrclse of due diligence.

11 contrnnanc.e w ~

Furthermore, r'he Court finds that

the e11ds ol !us .Ice served by griu~l l ~ 11.x . g !cquasltd coatinualce cjurwe~gh best i r l t t r ~oitthe the ~

8
9

j/ pubhc a i d ibc dcfcndant in

I'

aspr~?~y l mn

and ei ?he prunip: d i ~ p o i i ~ iu~ iciirnhnal cares, il:~ l i

1

1

Gla;rcJrc cuiicludci

ihi:; c a i : ' ~ r i ~ n of':ine shouli be made udic IS i S C .

I

13

i I l4I
l.5

DA~I.ED: 2/14/08

.-

ROSALD M. Wy 1'E x IjZJlI'LD STATES U1S'lGi;-j-JJGp(;E

1

1

I
I
I

I9
20

1 Poston. bI~ss~chusetts 10 021
RI(':HAKDC CHENC; Assistant United States Attvrnzy Anomey for i ialnriii 130 Alrnadcn Boulevard, suite Y ( l l j Salk Jose, Cai, camla 35 !13

i

i

21
22

i
2=

i

iI

i

i I

I

I

SZEOGE~LTS

o ~ ~ a ~ s o 3 v u o s r n o l ~ y ~ r ~ ~ E : Z O 80 SO ~S a w W l : 11 800Z S (lad pan! a3ad