Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 197.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 493 Words, 2,802 Characters
Page Size: 609 x 816 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43229/637-5.pdf

Download Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona ( 197.9 kB)


Preview Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona
EXHIBIT 3

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 637-5

Filed 04/03/2007

Page 1 of 3

-

-

* *

**

**-

a *

--

*

Anders Rosenquist Jr. ROSENQUIST & ASSOCIATES Attorneys at Law
80 EAST COLUMBUS PROEND1 ARIZONA 85012

DRLfl NO. SS0102 FAX NC. 484-488-2015

carnavo cRmnNasncww

BAR NO, tYV24

September 1, 2006

Ray Baths

Fenuemore Craig

2003 North Central Avenue Suite 2600 Thoefl Mizona 85012-2913 Edward It Grey Garvey McNeil & McGilllvray 634 Won Mail Street Suke 101 Madison, WI 53703

Ira Sacks DREJR, LLP 499 Park. Avenuc Ntr Yorlç NY 10022

*

Re: Meadowldi Lemon etaL CV -04-- 299-PIJX-DGC Dear Sirs, SI3TFLEMENT DEMAND It is hard to atdve stan accurate number. Clay and his attouteys and Ploreuce and I have oar opinions, based on what we think will happen atatriai. Iknowwe agreed to the settlement conference and will listen intently to why you think you can win at trial, end why you think you can get a nuafl verdict tint right now we don't see it. I ann siot Uniting about number cnnnclSg I ant biking about people ripping off a group of celebritice for SWots of dollan, and then, when they are caught, they do evety underhanded thing they can to sabotage the case, front ettOight lying to withhokling and manipulating disclosure: Interesting that FLIBU didn't break downt iaccatne per plAyer but Mannie did? Think bard about Reasonable Thftnnnea, and jwy not1ons. 1 can*t wait for in to say, in his opening argument, our gUys are "no bodleC like everyone heard him say at the motions hearing, even the Judge. It is also intei-vsting that an operton as big as Disney would not want to be involved. We will see if the Motion wet This case couldprobably be settled before the conference if we could just have an honest coed faith meeting with the right people at Disney. Not to damegc Mannic, but to discuss the ssnbi1ity of broad, long term heensug agreemenla. Ourgays are not getting a-ny

Exhibit D

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 637-5

Filed 04/03/2007

Page 2 of 3

F.

younper and once they are gooe, a wenithufihilent, andfust hand infonnatlon will be gone. Ifthis case s settled, with their rights secure, they would be able to moire forward with all their projects involving the Giobettottrs, like the attimadolL 111w abunt theo. If they ere not in the ioop and we settle, they will ti11 not have the right to use our guys. It seeus like a win win situation. f1naily, We conlelaly would anenaider our demasd if things worked out with Disney. Meadowlatk Lemon, to nettle the case at thin point, will accept front
Mmaiie & Catherine Jacknon Seven Million Five Hundred Thonsand Dollars. Hailein Gobe.trotters itt, line.
-

Seven Million Five Hundred Thousand Dolhtrs

GTFM, LLC FUBU Twen Million Dollar&

Case 2:04-cv-00299-DGC

Document 637-5

Filed 04/03/2007

Page 3 of 3