Free Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 62.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 6, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 599 Words, 3,503 Characters
Page Size: 610 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/43222/104.pdf

Download Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Arizona ( 62.2 kB)


Preview Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Arizona
I GAONA LAw FIRM
2 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
3101 NORTH CENTRAL AVE, SUITE 720
3 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 65012
4 (602) 230-2636 Fax (602) 230-1377
5 David F. Gaona, State Bar N0. 007391
Nicole Seder Cantelme, State Bar No. 021320
6
7 Attorneys for Defendants
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
10
1] MONICA ORTEGA-GUERIN, N0. CV04—0289 PHX MHM
12 Plaintiff,
DEFENDANT FAVELA’S REPLY IN
13 vs. SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO
CONFORNU CORRECT THE
14 CITY OF PHOENIX, FRANK JUDGMENT
FAVELA, AND FRANK PERALTA,
I 5
Defendants.
I6
17
18 Defendant F avela respectfully submits this Reply in support of his Motion to
19 Confonn/Correct the Judgment. A review of the Plaintiff` s Response confirms that there is
20 no legal basis upon which to deny the instant Motion to Conform/Correct the Judgment.
21
This C0u11’s Minutes, evidenced by a docket entry on the date of the Jury Verdict, indicate
22
23 that the Jury’s punitive damage award against the Defendant Favela was in the amount of
24 $35,000. This Court has sealed the actual forms of verdict, and, thus, in order to contirm the
25 appropriateness of this Motion to Conform and Correct the punitive damage Judgment
26
against Mr. Favela, the Court should unseal the form of verdict relating to Mr. Favela and
27
Case 2:04-cv-00289-IVIHIVI Document 104 Filed O3/06/2006 Page 1 of 3

1 allow determination of the appropriateness of this motion. lf this Court deems it appropriate,
2 it can issue an Order permitting counsel for Favela to review the jury verdict form upon
3
4 unsealing it for purposes of review.
5 For all the foregoing reasons, Defendant Favela respectfully requests that this Motion
6 he granted and that the Judgment against him he conformed from $350,000 to $35,000.
7
8 DATED this 6th day of March, 2006.
9 GAONA LAW FIRM
10
O 11 /s/ David F. Gaona
E S David F. Gaona
M tg 12 3101 N. Central Ave., Suite 720
Q °? g Phoenix, Arizona 85012
B E 13
5 if _§ 14 James J. Sampanes, Esq., ASB# 018143
< Q j Assistant City Attorney
Z Q 15 200 W. Washington Street
Q E € Suite 1300
Q; g 16 Phoenix, AZ 85003-1611
5 I.], Attorneys for Defendants
18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
19 1 hereby certify that on March 6, 2006, I electronically transmitted the attached
20
document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for tiling and transmittal of a
21
22 Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:
23 Stephen G. Montoya, Esq.
Montoya Jimenez, P.A.
24 The Great American Tower
25 3200 North Central Avenue, Suite 2550
Phoenix, Arizona 85012
26
27
2
Case 2:04-cv-00289-IVIHIVI Document 104 Filed O3/06/2006 Page 2 of 3

I I further certify that on March 6, 2006, the attached document was hand—delivered
2
to:
3 The Honorable Mary H. Murguia
4 United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Sandra Day O’Connor United States Courthouse
5 401 West Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
6
7
'8 /s/David F. Gaona
9
10
R I I
E 12
e 2: 13
eg S 5
1..1 if, § 14
é g 15
0 § 5
65 16
°° 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3
Case 2:04-cv-00289-I\/IHI\/I Document 104 Filed O3/06/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00289-MHM

Document 104

Filed 03/06/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00289-MHM

Document 104

Filed 03/06/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00289-MHM

Document 104

Filed 03/06/2006

Page 3 of 3