Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Joseph Richard Pedro, et al., 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Upon defense Motion to Continue Trial, Government not objecting, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED granting Defendants' Motion to Continue the trial date of 3/7/2006 and resetting trial on May 2, 2006 at 9:00 a.m., in Phoenix, Arizona The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. This finding is based upon the court's conclusion that the failure to grant such a continuance would deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking in account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). /// /// /// ///
Case 2:04-cr-01273-FJM Document 71 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, Plaintiff, vs.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CR 04-1273-PHX-FJM ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) is found to commence on 3/7/06 for a total of 56 days. DATED this 27th day of February, 2006.

-2Case 2:04-cr-01273-FJM Document 71 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 2 of 2