Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

WO

IN THE UNITED S TATES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DIS TRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, Plaintiff, vs. Robert J. Johnston, et al.,

14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CR-03-1167-PHX-DGC ORDER

The Government filed a supplemental ex parte application to defer certain discovery on November 4, 2005. Doc. #1061. P ursuant to Rule 16(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of

Criminal P rocedure, the Court granted the supplemental application in a public order issued on December 27, 2005. Doc. #1012 ¶ 8. The Court s et fort h its reasons for granting the supplemental application in a separate sealed order filed on January 17, 2006. Doc. #1074. As requested in the supplemental application, the Government may defer the disclosure of the following joint discovery matrix items: 10-11, 14-22, 38, 195, 206, 208, 212, 230, 243, and 255. See Doc. #743. With res p ect to Item 459, the Government may defer the disclosure of the requested material except for statements made by Defendant s Craig Kelly and Henry Watkins that are subject to disclosure under Rule 16(a)(1)(A)-(B). Government s hall disclose any such statements by January 27, 2006. The

With respect to

Case 2:03-cr-01167-DGC

Document 1078

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Item 40, t he medical history and records for CI-604, the Government indicated in the joint discovery matrix that it has no such material. protective order with respect to Item 40. DATED this 17th day of January, 2006. The Court accordingly will not grant a

-2-

Case 2:03-cr-01167-DGC

Document 1078

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 2