Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
I FOR THE NINT'H CIRCUIT _
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-10444
D.C. No. CR—03—00606-MI—IM
Plaintiff- Appellee, .
V.
JUDGMENT
JUAN DEDIOS MARTINEZ, -
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix). I
This cause came on to be heard on the Transcript of the Record from the
United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Phoenix) and was duly
submitted.
_ On consideration whereoi it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
Court, that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be, and hereby is
AFFIRMED.
Filed and entered 12/13/06
A mus c01¤v
cAT»-Tv A. CAITERSON
‘ Clerk of Court
. ATTEST .....
· _ QAN nsznrit
A 'r
bY: W J xxl l
Depu I E !
Case 2:03-cr—OO606-I\/IHIVI Document 58 Filed O1/O9/2007 Page 1 of 3

7
r FILED
Nor Fon PUBLICATION DEC 13 2000
cpm-w A. cA·r1·ERsou cuamc
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 0-5- 000PT 0P APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-10444 .
Plaintiff — Appellee, D.C. N0. CR-03-00606-MHM
v.
JUAN DEDIOS MARTINEZ, MEMORANDUM "
Defendant - Appellant. l
. Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona _
Mary H. Murguia, Distict Judge, Presiding
I
Submitted December 4, 2006**
Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Juan Dedios Martinez appeals from the district court’s order revoking his
supervised release and imposing an 8-month sentence. He originally pleaded
guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 922(g)(l) and 924(a)(2).
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be
cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
H This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision Without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Case 2:03-cr—OO606-I\/IHIVI Document 58 Filed O1/O9/2007 Page 2 of 3

Pursuant to Anders v. Calyormkz, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel for Martinez
has tiled a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw
p as counsel of record. No pro se or government brief has been tiled. e
i Our independent review ofthe record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 83-84 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief
Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the
· district couit’s order. .
A mus cow
CATHY A. cxxrrensow
Clerk of Court
ATTEST-·”
JAN U 9 2U'B7
...... .;g
2 by Dee
fl. F
Case 2:03-cr-00606-I\/IHIVI Document 58 Filed O1/O9/2007 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00606-MHM

Document 58

Filed 01/09/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00606-MHM

Document 58

Filed 01/09/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00606-MHM

Document 58

Filed 01/09/2007

Page 3 of 3