Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Upon Stipulation of the Parties to Extend Time for Plaintiff to File a Reply to Defendants' Responsive Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Related Non-Taxable Expenses, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff has until December 6, 2005, to File a Reply to Defendants' Responsive Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Related Non-Taxable Expenses. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall promptly submit to the Court their courtesy copies of all filings. This Court has not received its courtesy copy of Plaintiff's ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) The Mills Corporation, a foreign corporation;) Mills Services Corp., a foreign corporation;) and Arizona Mills, L.L.C., a foreign) ) corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) Nicholas Alozie, a single man, Case No. CIV 02 2639 PHX SRB ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND RELATED NON-TAXABLE EXPENSES

Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Attorneys' Fees nor has it received Defendant's response. The Case Management/Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and

Case 2:02-cv-02639-SRB

Document 164

Filed 11/29/2005

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Procedures Manual directs "The next business day after the electronic filing, the courtesy copy must be either post-marked and mailed directly to the judge or hand-delivered to the judge's mail box located in the courthouse." The motion will not be considered if the courtesy copies are not provided. DATED this 29th day of November, 2005.

2

Case 2:02-cv-02639-SRB

Document 164

Filed 11/29/2005

Page 2 of 2