Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 57.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: November 21, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 369 Words, 2,232 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23001/50.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 57.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
r Case 3:03-cv-08630-DJS Document 50 Filed F/5 4/2003 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
i
MARIO RICHARDS, : l
on behalf of himself and : CIVIL ACTION g
all others similarly situated : 3:03 CV00630 §gI§) j ....¤
PLAINTIFFS, : as tb
• _ -•- WK;
v. : gg; I: gw-
, gg U Wl g
COMPUTER SCIENCES : - 4;,- @
CORPORATION : November 14, 20023* L,)
DEFENDANT. · .
E
§[,AINTIFF’§ MQTIQN [QR ENLARGEMENT QF TIME TQ- REPLY TO
DEFEN'DANT’§ MEMORANDQM IN OPPQSITIQN TO CLASS I
QE RTIEIQATION AND NOTICE
I
Plaintiii Mario Richards, requests pursuant to Local Rule 7 (b) that the court
grant an enlargement of time to November 17, 2003 to reply to defendanfs memorandum
t
in opposition to plaintiff s motion for class certification and notice. This is the -
third request for enlargement of time in this matter. W
Pgggural Bgckgggugg p
The plaintitlj Mario Richards, commenced this action on April 7, 2003 pursuant l
to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. (FLSA), claiming wages for
overtime hours worked in excess of forty hours per week. Plaintiff seeks class
certification for all similarly situated employees. Defendant’s memorandum in
opposition to class certification and notice was tiled on or about October 14, 2003. l
l
Reason fg; Reguest
Counsel for the plaintiff has spent substantial time with witnesses in this matter
g I
5
. F
F as

J
r Case 3:03-cv—0(llgC§D—DJS Document 50 Filed @@4/2003 Page 2 of 2 {
in recent weeks, thereby requiring additional time within which to respond. Further,
!
counsel for plaintiff has been required to attend to other legal matters in recent weeks.
Oggogigg Qggnsei
Plaintiif is unaware of defendanfs position in this matter. {
l
Plaintifi
Mario Richards l
E
i
lt
Br l
Michael}. Melly
Fed. Bar N0. ct 7841
143 Oneco Av e Suite 4
New London, T 06320
Tel: (860) 44 -1990
(860) 989-9613
l
I
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed on ////1/;} E
To: S
Tasos C. Paindiris, Esq.
William Anthony, Esq.
Jackson Lewis I
S5 Farmington Avenue i
Suite l200 ; i
Hartford, Ct 06105 i
I
Michael J. e ly l
r
i
{
i

l
l
________r_ i