Free Order - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 9.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 354 Words, 2,404 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/9342/438.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Colorado ( 9.8 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:01-cv-02076-LTB-PAC

Document 438

Filed 02/28/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Lewis T. Babcock, Chief Judge Civil Case No. 00-cv-00808-LTB-PAC BRIAN E. ROHRBOUGH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WAYNE F. HARRIS, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________________________________________________ Civil Case No. 01-cv-02076-LTB-PAC MARK ALLEN TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. __________________________________________________________________________ NOTICE __________________________________________________________________________

In Case No. 01-cv-02076-LTB, depositions of Wayne and Kathy Harris were taken and remain subject to the protective order entered in that case. In Case No. 00-cv-00808-LTB, depositions of Wayne and Kathy Harris and Thomas and Susan Klebold were taken and remain subject to the protective order entered in that case. The depositions in Case No. 01cv-02076-LTB have apparently been reviewed and signed by the deponents. The depositions

1

Case 1:01-cv-02076-LTB-PAC

Document 438

Filed 02/28/2007

Page 2 of 2

in Case No. 00-cv-00808-LTB have been transcribed but apparently not reviewed and signed by the deponents. It now appears clear that the only remaining issue upon objections to the " Evidence Room Order of September 23, 2003" centers upon disposition of these depositions. The title of the Magistrate Judge' September 23, 2003 order is misleading because these depositions s and the deposition exhibits have neither been admitted as evidence nor cited, under seal or otherwise, in any proceeding or pleading in either case. The Magistrate Judges'order in question will be referred to from now on as the September 23, 2003 Order. The interested parties and those appearing amicus curie have submitted diverse position papers concerning the disposition of these depositions. To render an informed decision concerning their disposition it is necessary for me to read the depositions. Accordingly, the parties are notified that the Court will undertake to read and review in camera the depositions and deposition exhibits in question. The depositions will be obtained with the assistance of the Special Master and held in secure fashion during the period of in camera review. BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Chief Judge

DATED: February 28, 2007

2