Free Objection - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 9.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 473 Words, 3,034 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/23666/326.pdf

Download Objection - District Court of Arizona ( 9.2 kB)


Preview Objection - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Stephen D. Hoffman, #13875 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP Phoenix Plaza Tower II 2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 1700 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2761 Telephone: (602) 385-1040 Facsimile: (602) 385-1051 Attorneys for Wong and World Nutrition

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

MARLYN NUTRACEUTICALS, INC., an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff,

No. CIV 02-1876 PHX-HRH DEFENDANTS WORLD NUTRITION'S AND WILLIAM AND MICHELE WONG'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED FORM OF JUDGMENT AGAINST WORLD NUTRITION, INC., WILLIAM AND MICHELE WONG AND PATRICK BUEHL (Assigned to The Honorable H. Russell Holland)

12

vs.
13 14 15 16 17 18

WILLIAM WONG and JANE DOE WONG, husband and wife; PATRICK BUEHL and JANE DOE BUEHL, husband and wife; WORLD NUTRITION, INC., an Arizona corporation; ABC Corporations I-X; XYZ PARTNERSHIPS I-X; and JOHN DOES I-X and JANE DOES I-X, husbands and wives, respectively, Defendants,

19 20 21 22

WORLD NUTRITION, INC., an Arizona corporation, Third Party Plaintiff/Counterclaimant/ Defendant, vs.

23 24 25 26 27 28

MARLYN NUTRACEUTICALS, INC., an Arizona Corporation; and CRAIG KNOBLOCH, Counterdefendant/Plaintiff/Third Party Defendant.

Case 2:02-cv-01876-HRH 4848-6291-9682.1

Document 326

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 2

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendants World Nutrition, Inc. and William and Michele Wong hereby object to Plaintiff's proposed form of judgment against World Nutrition, William and Michele Wong and Patrick Buehl for the reason that the Court ordered, in its November 13, 2006 Order on Plaintiff's Post-trial Motions, that the judgment shall be sealed. (See, Clerk's Docket #241, page 16.) Plaintiff's proposed form of judgment makes no reference to the judgment being sealed. Defendants also have an objection to the extent that Michele Wong's name is incorrectly spelled.
DATED this 1st day of November, 2007. LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP

By:________s/ Stephen Hoffman_________________ Stephen D. Hoffman Attorneys for Wong and World Nutrition

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 1st day of November, 2007, a copy of the foregoing DEFENDANTS WORLD NUTRITION AND WILLIAM AND MICHELE WONG'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO RULE 60 MOTION FOR RELIEF was filed electronically. A Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) will be sent by operation of the Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system to the filing party, the assigned Judge and any registered user in the case as indicated on the NEF. All other parties will be served by regular U.S. mail. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

____S/Stephen D. Hoffman________________ Stephen D. Hoffman LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP Phoenix Plaza Tower II 2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 1700 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2761 Telephone: (602) 385-1040 Facsimile: (602) 385-1051

Case 2:02-cv-01876-HRH
4848-6291-9682.1

Document 326

2

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 2